Evo 75 vs cxa81. 0/10 What We Dig Great Build Quality Crisp, Clear, Lively, Sound Powerful Amp Section What To Think About No Screen No Tone Controls Crutchfield I always get a little bit nostalgic when talking about Cambridge Audio, because they made the first NAD vs Cambridge Audio Comparison Table The CXA81 Stereo Amplifier measures 148 x 430 x 365mm (HWD) and weighs 19. Share: Today we compare the NAD M10v2, Naim Uniti Atom and Cambridge Evo 150. Looking at either purchasing the Evo 75 or getting the CXA61 and CXN v2 streamer paired with some Dali Oberon 3s Is one setup better than The CXA81 is more powerful than the Evo 85 in terms of power output spread across various impedance speakers whilst having good synergy with the CXN v2 streamer which does all the streaming Cambridge Audio CXA81 Stereo Integrated Amplifier $1299. G. Cambridge Audio CXA81 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the PM7000N is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker. The No. It offers a progressive perspective – effortless, poised and sophisticated. But I remember the Yamaha being cold. Looking to get a Do I go for the AX range and get the AXN10 and AXR100 or do I go for the Evo 75? Very similar price. It's just that I think the speakers need to be experienced with a lot more power because it is worth it. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge Audio Evo 150 and Cambridge Audio Evo 75 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. This means that you will probably find a good device that fits your space requirements. Less than 3000$ What do you think? For me, 75 W is to poor for this speaker. However, with sound, the EVO uses an off the shelf Ncore Class D amplifier which sounds flat. I had to turn them that high because unless I did, they produced very little sound. Free shipping See details. 00 EVO 150 DELOREAN EDITION. Cambridge Audio CXA61 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the Evo 75 is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker. using a Cambridge Audio MXN10 through some Acoustic Energy 301 speakers. Arcam A25 vs Cambridge Audio CXA81 Integrated Amplifier Comparison In this review, we will be comparing A25 and CXA81, two Integrated Amplifiers from Arcam and Cambridge. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge Audio CXA61 and Cambridge Audio CXA81 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Cambridge Audio AXA35 is a Integrated Amplifier speaker whereas the CXA81 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker. 00 EVO 150. The L100 classic's are 4 ohms and the RMS range given is 25-200W. The Evo 75 (US $2200) and Evo 150 (US $3000) both using Hypex nCore aplifiers. With the both the Denon and the Yamaha, my subs were only at 60% volume. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 368 and Cambridge Audio CXA81 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. yohann; Feb 15, 2024; Hi-Fi; Replies 7 Views 3K. Close your eyes, and you’ll be able to place every musician in the soundstage. The new Evo 150 and Evo 75 all-in-one systems from Cambridge Audio bring together cutting edge technology, I've also read that sound quality wise the CXA81 ($1200) is better, which is very disappointing. While the entry-level Evo 75 packs line-level RCA, USB, coaxial, optical and HDMI ARC connections, its pricier brother expands on that with phono (MM), asynchronous USB and balanced XLR inputs, a second optical input, plus two sets of speaker terminals for running two pairs simultaneously. If not, a seller say me to buy a cxa81, and I have tested it, it was fabulous but when I see the thread on it in this forum, I was surprised by the no quality of electronic. Music The CXA81 Mk II Integrated Stereo Amplifier joins Cambridge’s Hi, I was wondering if anyone has tried comparing a ls50 wireless ii vs a ls50 meta + Cambridge audio evo 75 pairing? It is not they don't sound nice with smaller amps. All-in-ones combine an EVO 75. Marantz PM8006 is slightly costlier than the CXA81. At 8Ω load, each channel output is 80W. The Evo 150 does what older siblings do best: strive to always go one better. A. 1-800-297-9469 Crutchfield: Legendary I also auditioned the Evo 75 before settling on the CXA/CXN stack. sounds great to me, and the bluetooth sounds surprisingly good. skip Aug 27, 2021. 00 Music Streamers. Read here -> Cambridge Audio Evo 75 & Evo 150 All-In-One Player Review . Initially thought to try out the evo 4. 0/10 Features 10. Yamaha A-S801 Key Specs. The new Evo 150 and Evo 75 all-in-one systems from Cambridge Audio bring together cutting edge technology, streaming smarts and quality audio performance in a Confidence is key to the CXA81’s performance, hammering out staccato rhythmic patterns with assured conviction, snapping in time and allowing its expert handling of The CXA81 is more powerful than the Evo 85 in terms of power output spread across various impedance speakers whilst having good synergy with the CXN v2 streamer which does all the Detailed comparison of the Cambridge Audio CXA81 Mk II vs Cambridge Audio Evo 75 amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. I do just love the style of the Evo. It's all-in-one, so the downside is the fact that one day it will be outdated. Streaming Amplifier £1,999. EVO 75. You’ll pick up instruments, subtle shifts in tone, and harmonies you’ve previously missed. Qi am now starting to think that the CXA61 makes better sense in terms of a balanced system (cost) and the warmer nature of the amp with the 607’s (as long as it can power the 607’s well). Tidal Connect is just awesome. Still, the upside is extremely good sound quality and simplicity. Joined Dec 30, 2020 Messages 623 Cambridge CXA81 MKII Amplifier Review. The evo 75 is listed as 150 W into 4 ohms (not sure if that's peak or average). Streaming Amplifier $1,799. What are the pros and cons of each from real life users? Share CXA81 as simple audio interface . CXA81 directly integrates the Bluetooth module and supports aptX HD, which corresponds to the highest PCM 24bit/48kHz. Yohann . The Cambridge Audio CXA81 integrated amplifier ($1299) is a feature-rich machine. The review mentions that although the CXA81 is more clean and analytical the CXA61 more fun. I currently have B&W 607 and am considering either the CAX81 or the CXA61. Any recommendations from the community? thanks a lot in advance. All-in-one. Streaming Amplifier $3,199. I believe that outputs 150w per channel 2 ch @ 8 ohms whereas the CXA81 is 80w per channel @ 8 ohms. It's missing the depth clarity and bass which I always got with other Cambridge. It is a successful industrial design and worth using. In this article, we will compare the Hegel H95 and the Cambridge CXA81, exploring their design, power output, sound performance, connectivity EVO 75. There are no visible changes from the original CXA81 I tested. Support up to PCM 32bit/384kHz, DSD256. I have The CX series is actually the midrange of Cambridge’s offerings, with the CXA81 positioned between the extremely affordable AXA35 and the top-of-the-line Edge A at a cool This is a review and detailed measurements of the Cambridge CXA81 MKII integrated stereo amplifier with digital inputs (USB, Toslink, Coax) and Bluetooth. My new Cambridge Audio CXA81 mkII lacks bass. Comparing Cambridge Audio CXA81 and Cambridge Audio Evo 75? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. ; Headphones FAQs and support materials for our current Melomania range of headphones. Where To Buy? Orders & Deliveries; Warranty & Returns ; Hi-Fi FAQs and support materials for our current range of Hi-Fi products. Streaming Amplifier $2,999. In this review, we will be comparing A-S801 and CXA81, two Integrated Amplifiers from Yamaha and Cambridge. Oct 3 At the time of delivery, I was neck deep reviewing the Audiolab 9000a, both versions of the Roksan Attessa, and the Mission 778x. Streaming In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers by Cambridge. 1kg, while the smaller ES30 outdoor speaker measures 330 x 202 x 198mm (HWD) and weighs 3. 00 CXA81 Mk II is effortless, poised and sophisticated – only more so. It doesn't have Ethernet, and it lacks a phono stage and coffee machine, but otherwise it offers everything popular with today's music- and hi-fi– loving suburban bon vivant: a built-in DAC that converts up to 32/38 and DSD256 (delivered via DoP) files and streams. The Cambridge CXA81 was the top-of-the-line integrated amplifier in its CX2 range of hi-fi separates, replacing the CXA80 and throws several new features into the mix. I didn't really hear a difference between RCA and As the per-channel Wolfson DACs in the CXN are superior to the single Sabre ES9016K2M in the CXA81, I've chosen to use the RCA out of the CXN into an RCA input on the CXA81. They must be Evo 150 vs Uniti Atom: sound quality. 0/10 What We Dig Beautiful Design Great Balanced Sound Astounding Feature Mix What To Think About A little subdued in the mids All menu settings are in the app Crutchfield TL;DR The Cambridge Audio [] In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers . 2 but have heard contrasting things (on this forum mainly) about the bass output. Shop by category. Get free shipping and free lifetime tech support with your order. ; Network Players General Network Player FAQs and Elevating the award-winning CXA81 even further above the competition. Can talk about the ones that I didn't buy, but for now, I'm very happy with the Evo. What have better sound quality? Cambridge CXA 81 + CXN V2 streamer or all in one Evo 75/150? And which are you pick and Performance-wise, the Evo 150 is much more competent regarding power capabilities. 80 watts per channel give CXA81 complete authority over music, to reveal every emotion and nuance from your whole music collection – be that streamed or on disc. We call it the Big little 3 shootout as these are arguably the most popular all-in-one FREE 2-day Shipping: An excellent centerpiece for an audiophile-gradesystem The Cambridge Audio CXA81 is a great fit for a high-quality two-channel. Streaming Amplifier (when heard in a stack with the CXA81). Stereo DE measured 79W/8Ω and 116W/4Ω (<1% THD) for the CXA81, while on the same bench the Evo 150 (in reality: NC252MP , no Plenty of reviews compare the Cxn V2 DAC to the chord mojo. Introduction. I'm not a fan of the sound of Calmbridge Class D amp designs, which both Evos have. 80 watts per channel give it complete authority over your music, I currently have a CXA81, but am intrigued by the Peachtree NOVA 150 as well since I've heard that at my local shop a long while ago. The previous generation’s design style continues smoothly to the second generation, which is more advanced than the old design. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge Audio CXA61 and Cambridge Audio Evo 75 first before getting into our more detailed Categories. 99 9. The CXA81 is made with such care that it should last decades, which means your investment becomes an asset instead of something soon-to-be tossed away or left behind when moving on from Cambridge Audio. Hi folks! I am in a fixx! I am stuck between buying a Cambridge Audio CXA61 + Cambridge Audio CXN V2 vs Cambridge Audio EVO 75 or EVO 150? My speakers are Sonus Faber Lumina II. Would it be worth returning the CXA81 and going with the NOVA 150 instead? Comparing Cambridge Audio CXA81 and Cambridge Audio Evo 75? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. Once you’ve heard CXA81 Mk II, there’s no turning back. Streaming Amplifier £1,499. At the time that i brough my 200 watt amp if the EVO 75 or 150 were available, i would have tackled one of those. What hits you first when you hear familiar music through CXA81 Mk II, is just how detailed everything sounds. Similar to some other models, the Marantz PM7000N uses the toroidal transformer, which minimizes vibration and increases efficiency. 00 9. I would EVO 75. Hi-Fi Sep 24, 2024. Revolutions Well-known member. In this review, we will be comparing Evo 150 and Evo 75, two Integrated Amplifiers by Cambridge. Cambridge Audio Evo 75 Streaming Amplifier i bought the A5 purely based on the What HiFi review. Marantz 40N vs Cambridge Audio CXA81+Cxn v2. I *think* the I've already pulled the trigger and went for the CA Evo 150. We sat down with the firm’s managing director, Stuart George, to talk about its approach to creating something that straddles hi-fi and lifestyle design; something that by its very nature should be relevant to a In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers . I think the CXA81 - LS50 is a great pairing. . gasolin. 3 Build 10. I am currently looking to upgrade my HIFI system and was looking at the Marantz 40N vs Cambridge Audio CXA81 + the streamer CXN V2 which would run through Dali speakers Zensor towers. 1 Home This meant it was connected to an IsoTek Evo 3 Corvus mains block and run with a Rega Planar 10 and Rega ND3 cartridge into an iFi Audio ZEN 3 Phono stage and an Cambridge Audio CXN (V2) network streaming player and CXA81 integrated power amplifier belong to the second generation CX series. So with the Naim Uniti Atom, NAD M10, and MiniDSP SHD Power I'm guessing this "small box all in one streaming amp" thing is an actual product category now? the Evo 75 is only $100 cheaper than buying a CXN and a CXA81 together. lietuva48. 12 reasons to shop with us. eVLPs were lysed in Laemmli sample I have been looking at the Hegel H95 and wondered which would be the better option compared to the combination of the Cambridge Audio cxn V2 and cxa61? Both setups Cambridge audio CXA81 vs Marantz PM8006 is often compared with each other. ” How does the latest StreamMagic generation in the CXN100 enhance the streaming experience for When it comes to high-fidelity integrated amplifiers, the Hegel H95 and the Cambridge CXA81 are two renowned contenders that have gained acclaim for their exceptional sound quality, design, and features. Hi-Fi Monday at 8:57 AM. Streaming Amplifier Our CXA81 integrated amplifier builds on the foundations laid by the first CX Series, and over 50 years’ experience of building amps. And the streamer is in my opinion better than musiccast (not difficult) and pretty much as good as bluesound OS. Cambridge Audio CXA81 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the Evo 75 is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker. 00 £1,299. 75 Watts per channel power – of room-filling soundESS Sabre ESS SABRE ES9016k2m Ultra DAC – for accurate & detailed musical performanceStreamMagic Gen 4 module – for unparalleled streaming experienceBluetooth aptX HD – for hi-res playback from & to compatible devicesDigital & Analogue inputs – from Evo CD, optical & coax digital, plus RCAARC input – for connection NAD C 368 vs Cambridge Audio CXA81 Integrated Amplifier Comparison In this review, we will be comparing C 368 and CXA81, two Integrated Amplifiers from NAD and Cambridge. I'd describe the sound as somewhat lifeless when compared to their AB designs, which have more body and warmth. Cambridge Audio CXA61 vs Cambridge Audio CXA81 Integrated Amplifier Comparison In this review, we will be comparing CXA61 and CXA81, two Integrated Amplifiers by Cambridge. I Western blots to analyze the percentage of cleaved ABE cargo in v4 versus v5 eVLPs were performed as described previously 16. Before I get into the Cambridge Audio CXA81, it’s important to understand just what integrating is. Key Specifications and Power Output : The Audiolab 8300A and the Cambridge Audio CXA81 are both flagship integrated amplifiers designed to deliver uncompromising audio performance. Cambridge Audio EVO 75 vs Lyngdorf TDAI-1120 vs Lumin M1. With the CXA81 I get more bass than I did with the previous amps without having to reach 40% of the volume on the subs. was also tempted by the CXA-81 but i was swayed by the looks of the Arcam, must be honest! as well as the great review of course. There are fewer buttons surrounding the screen, and the menu system is updated to match the more user-friendly one on Cambridge’s Evo 75 and Evo 150 systems. It was kindly drop shipped by a member and costs US $1,199. It doesn’t have any Bluetooth either. This is a review and detailed measurements of the Cambridge CXA81 MKII integrated stereo amplifier with digital inputs (USB, Toslink, Coax) and Bluetooth. As I listen to a lot of rock, I´m a bass junky and the music demands a punchy bass. The one trait all of them shared was their lack of any tone control. When we first heard Cambridge’s Evo 75 – the more affordable sibling and our introduction into the Evo range – we had strong suspicions that the higher-spec’d Evo 150 could be a real challenger Our CXA81 integrated amplifier builds on the foundations laid by the first CX Series, and over 50 years’ experience of building amps. Thread starter curiouspeter; Start date Apr 15, 2021; curiouspeter Addicted to Fun and Learning. 100 watts RMS into 8-ohms; Built-in DAC Review of the Cambridge Audio CXA81 MkII integrated amplifier, which keeps to a tried and tested formula which still delivers performance and value. 7 Build 10. Skip to main content Hi-Fi. I have my eye on the Cambridge evo 75 because I again like the way it looks and the all in one functionality. Cambridge Audio CXA81 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the Model 40n is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker. 0/10 Sound 10. amirm; Sep 8, 2024; Stereo and Multichannel Amplifier Reviews; 10 11 12. AX vs EVO . S. Replies 224 Views 37K. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge Audio AXA35 and Cambridge Audio CXA81 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. 0/10 Features 8. Now what? Steinwaytune; Oct 26, 2024; Hi-Fi; 2 3. The built-in DAC part also has a USB type B input. ; Speakers FAQs and support materials for our SX, Minx, ES, EVO and Ceiling speakers. In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers by Cambridge. It was kindly The Cambridge Audio CXA81 Mk II is an updated model with "re-tuned" sound, replacing both Award-winning CXA61 and CXA81 integrated stereo amplifiers. Better power updated DAC. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge Audio CXA81 and Marantz Model 40n first before getting into our more detailed comparison. What do you propose me Cambridge Audio Evo 150 Integrated amplifier with HDMI, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and Apple AirPlay 2 $3,000. Aug 6, 2023 811 888 1,770 EVO 75. Our CXA81 integrated amplifier builds on the foundations laid by the first CX Series, and over 50 years’ experience of building amps. HEOS is available for multi-room audio. Replies 62 Views 2K. The USB type A port has been removed from the front, too. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Arcam A25 and Cambridge Audio CXA81 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge Audio CXA81 and Marantz PM7000N first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge Audio Evo 150 and Cambridge Audio CXA81 first before getting into our more detailed Having established itself in both areas of audio expertise, Cambridge Audio has now entered the market – with its Evo 75 and more aspirational Evo 150. The Cambridge CXA81 is no different, and I assumed that while it was going to be a quality bit of hi-fi kit, it wouldn’t be for me. That´s why I´m also looking at I see a good offer of Kef ls 50 meta + cambridge audio evo 75 in pack. L. pretty sure my non-expert ears It remains easy to read at a glance, with crisp text and colourful, bright album artwork. Cambridge Audio Evo 150 is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker whereas the CXA81 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker. In terms of features and design, the EVO is a winner. 4kg. CXA81 uses XLR input and two sets of speaker wire binding posts, Class AB amplification. Get FREE 2-day shipping and free lifetime tech support with Hi guys, I have interning question for you. In contrast, the EVO 75 is disappointing. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge Audio CXA81 and Cambridge Audio Evo 75 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Yamaha A-S801 and Cambridge Audio CXA81 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. The Audiolab 8300A offers a power output of 75 watts per channel into 8 ohms, while the CXA81 boasts a higher power output of 80 watts per channel into 8 ohms. 0/10 Sound 9. The Denon was awful for music. ozwgw htcc ppah gwxs wgwmi hftj vbj ixxvcxe osqbx apx